Friday, June 28, 2024

Something in the Heir by Suzanne Enoch

Emmeline and William Pershing have enjoyed a perfectly convenient marriage for eight years. Their relationship is a seamless blend of their talents and goals. They’ve settled into separate, well-ordered lives beneath the same roof, and are content to stay that way—or so Emmeline thinks. And if William has secretly longed for a bit more from the woman he adores, he’s managed to be content with her supreme skills as a hostess and planner, which has helped him advance his career.

 

Then when Emmeline’s grandfather, the reclusive Duke of Welshire, summons them both for his birthday celebration and demands they bring their two little angelic children, William is stunned to discover that his very proper wife invented not one, but two heirs to fulfill the agreement for living at Winnover. But surely if Emmeline and William team up and borrow two cherubs to call their own, what could go wrong? Enter George, age 8, and Rose, 5—the two most unruly orphans in Britain.

 

As the insanity unfolds, their careful, professional arrangement takes some surprisingly intimate turns as well. Perhaps it takes a bit of madness to create the perfect happily ever after.

 Publisher: Griffin | Genre: Historical  | Source:  Publisher | Rating: 2.5

I’ve been back in my romance-reading groove lately and was craving something historical so I immediately reached for this Suzanne Enoch book, as I absolutely love her historical romances. While I had an okay time, it wasn’t what I was expecting.

To keep her childhood home, Emmeline must marry and she knows the perfect husband: Will Pershing, her best friend whom she’s agreed to help with his political career if he’ll help her with her housing dilemma. There’s only one little problem, they must produce an heir to keep Winnover. Emmeline has the perfect solution; she’s created two perfect children with her pen rather than the traditional way. Things have been going swimmingly until Emmeline’s grandfather, the Duke of Welshire, invites Emmeline and her perfect family to his birthday celebrations. To keep their home they have no choice but to ‘borrow’ two children from the orphanage and hope to rein in their unruly charges before they must appear before the Duke.

This was not what I was expecting when I picked this book up.

While Emmeline and Will have been married 8 years, there’s nothing between them other than a business arrangement. I couldn’t get past their friendship to find the chemistry with them as a couple. The romance and relationship between them was definitely on the backburner and when the author tried to introduce some sort of relationship, it just felt awkward.

I found the antics of George and Rose to be cute and charming. They were two little wild things set loose on a grand house and they get into some interesting situations.

What I didn’t like was the way Will and Emmeline handled the children. They were using them with the sole purpose of keeping their house and career. While I could see Will developing an attachment to the children and showing them affection as the plot progressed, Emmeline was cold, almost cruel at times as she tried to mold them into ‘proper’ children.  The fact that they were viewing this as ‘giving the children a holiday’ from the orphanage and ‘using them as part of a new scheme to train orphans for suitable jobs in the future’ was just cringe-worthy.

It would have made more sense if they just would have adopted the kids and actually showed them affection from the start of the book rather than just planning to borrow the children for a few weeks.

Then there’s whole middle of the book when the children’s older brother shows up and causes chaos that just felt out of place.

I have a few questions. In her letters to family, Emmeline stated that the children were too sickly to be out, which explained why their neighbors hadn’t seen them but what about her family? Given her station, the granddaughter of a duke, and the fact he had a career in politics, they would have had public christenings for both children, even if they were sickly. Did no one in her family question this, especially since it was obligatory that she have heirs in order to keep the house?

Overall, I’m a little conflicted about this book. Yes, it made for a comedic read at times. Was it a romance? Not at all. Was it historical? Yes. Was it believable? Nope. Did I enjoy it? Not really sure. Honestly, this could have been an okay novella, possibly even a short story thrown in the back of a book or in an anthology but it just didn’t work as a full-length novel. 

No comments: